Our
afternoon began with mixed emotions, those of nervousness and excitement…how
much experience would each group ‘bring to the table’ and what were their
expectations? Our expectations were to create a fairly realistic environment by
providing airway skill stations such as endotracheal intubation, LMA insertion
and surgical airways. The plan was then to slowly introduce them to simulation cases
and “go from there”.
As our first group of approximately 10
participants approached the table, I could tell from their eyes that they were
nervous as well which put me far more at ease. The initial plan was to divide
the groups into 2 where Christian would take half to the surgical airway skills
station and I would take half to the intubation, LMA and basic airway adjuncts
station. At the same time, we were both feverishly attempting to locate our
translators for each skill station…soon we each had translators.
When asking each group who had performed
procedures such as intubation, several members of each group would raise their
hands.
Both Christian and I agreed that each of
our skill station’s goals should be to complete these skills in a safe and efficient
manner. We made it our goal to focus on preparation such as positioning,
pre-oxygenation, pre-treatment and to perform the actual procedure.
With each passing group, it became apparent
that each and every one of them was extremely knowledgeable and the only thing
separating us at times was a language barrier. Most members of each group had
intubated someone in the past but this also provided an opportunity to hone in
on skills as vitally important such as a 2-person bag valve mask, basic
oral/nasal airway adjuncts and rescue devices such as the Laryngeal Mask
Airway.
We slowly introduced new challenges
throughout the afternoon including intubation of the patient in spinal
immobilization as well as difficult airways. Each team member also had the
opportunity to facilitate intubation with a bougie device that was a new
concept for several members as it’s not a tool routinely stocked within their
hospital.
Overall, an excellent afternoon with lots
of learning and educational opportunities not just for them but also a great
opportunity for us to learn new concepts/ideas through their experiences and
knowledge.
Ultrasound
By: Anne Sutherland (partnered with Chau Pham)
My normal routine
For the CHKV mission, I was asked to
prepare a skills station to teach the use of ultrasound for musculoskeletal
procedures. Following my typical approach, I carefully planned a series of
exercises meant to move learners from absolute beginners to skilled
practitioners who would be able to identify fractures and perform joint injections
and arthrocentesis at multiple sites. I was told that there would be a number
of healthcare professionals trained in different subspecialties in attendance.
I had taught point of care ultrasonography
to small groups before, for individuals at different levels of training. I
envisioned a quick progression in skills from the initial image acquisition to
the identification of bones from the snowstorm that most beginner
ultrasonographers see on the screen. My plan was to give a hands-on
demonstration of needle-guided procedures using a surrogate material for the
human body, then use a human model to allow participants to scan the knee,
ankle, shoulder, and hip joints. After viewing normal anatomy, I would follow
with slides of images of pathology, of joint effusions and fractures.
The best laid plans
For the first day of teaching in Long Xuyen, only didactic lectures were scheduled. This allowed us to unpack and set up our individual skills stations, reassembling all of the equipment so carefully bubble-wrapped in Winnipeg. I could feel the excitement and anxiety that I always felt prior to a teaching session coming to the surface. I was unsure about the initial skill levels of the participants- perhaps I was the unskilled practitioner?
For the first day of teaching in Long Xuyen, only didactic lectures were scheduled. This allowed us to unpack and set up our individual skills stations, reassembling all of the equipment so carefully bubble-wrapped in Winnipeg. I could feel the excitement and anxiety that I always felt prior to a teaching session coming to the surface. I was unsure about the initial skill levels of the participants- perhaps I was the unskilled practitioner?
The afternoon of the next day we each
gathered by our station as participants milled around our tables, looking for
the stations that they wanted. All of our preparation realized, we each began
speaking, pausing intermittently to allow our translators to convey our message.
Throughout the afternoon, the numbers of participants at each station would
swell to what seemed to be 50 people, then down to 3 people, and back up again.
As the station progressed, I could see the participants taking on a larger role
and correcting their colleague’s hand and probe position without my input. At
times my presence felt absolutely integral while at times I felt unneeded.
Over the first few days of the mission, our
skills stations seemed to attract more and more participation. I found that the
most helpful way to teach was to cater to the specific needs of each
individual, depending on their specialty. Each day, I recognized more people,
who seemed to want further practice and guidance with our machines. Our
ultrasound machines were a curiosity, something different than what they had
seen before. Over our first week, I could see improvements in the probe
handling and image acquisition. I think my favourite moments were when my
translators and their colleagues would teach each other, pointing
enthusiastically at the ultrasound, pausing and translating when someone had a
question. It was then that I felt that my presence had been effective, and that
we had brought knowledge that may persist past our physical presence in the
country.
ICU and Ultrasound
By: Aaron Webb (partnered with Dave Easton)
I never thought that I’d spend two weeks of
the last 3 months prior to my Royal College exam flying to South-East Asia to
participate in a medical symposium. That
being said, Chau did not have to spend much time convincing me that this would
be a good idea. It took even less time
to convince my wife, Joanna, that it would be a good idea for her to come along
with our 18-month old son, Louie. Now
that the dust has settled, and the exam is successfully behind us, we couldn’t
be happier that we did.
Traveling with an infant is certainly a new
experience for us, and we found that experiencing the sights, smells, tastes,
and sounds of Vietnam through Louie brought on a special significance. It also helped that we were surrounded by a
fantastic team of people who came to feel like family by the end of our time
together. Sing-alongs at karaoke bars
and on the bus, making immature puns about the name of the Vietnamese dollar
(Dong), running through the market in the early morning, and filling our faces
with new and delicious food are some of my favourite memories of our down time
on the trip.
The medical symposium itself was a
fantastic experience. We found extremely
gracious hosts in the city of Long Xuyen, and a large group of very intelligent
physicians that were eager to learn the new procedures and information that we
were teaching.
One of the unique experiences I was able to
take part in was with clinical bedside ultrasound teaching. I found a willing accomplice in the ICU
director, Dr. Kieu. When I was not
delivering lectures or conducting skills stations, a couple of us would pack up
one of the ultrasounds and spend a few hours scanning patients in the ICU. We were delighted to see that they had a
machine, and several physicians were fairly adept at using them for FAST and
aortic aneurysm scans. Although we were
often missing a fully fluent translator, we were able to get the point across
with body language and clips from the EDE book that we had brought on an
iPad. One of the most rewarding moments
came after spending much time instructing one of the An Giang physicians on how
to perform a proper IVC scan. Later on that
morning, we watched as she passed on her newly honed skill to another colleague. This gave us optimism that what we shared
with our new Vietnamese friends would be carried forward long after we were
gone.
Pediatric Advanced Life Support
By Hareishun Shanmuganathan (partnered with Stasa Veroukis)

During one simulation code, Dr. Veroukis and I threw a little wrinkle into our simulation case, and showed our Vietnamese team leader a hand-drawn rhythm strip tracing. It was ventricular fibrillation. In addition to the team leader, the whole team saw it. Within a fraction of second, the whole team sprung into action! The airway physicians immediately started positioning the airway, and began setting up for an intubation. The medication team member reached for the drug syringes. The physician leader, eyes wide with concern, and a bit of healthy fear, immediately pointed to one of her team members to start CPR. Without a moment's hesitation, that team member interlocked their fingers and placed them on our paper model's chest, and began the first compression...and then sheepishly smiled. Educators, and mock code team members alike shared a warm little chuckle, but applauded our colleague for how much they "bought in" to the virtual patient. Our dear, oh so vulnerable, paper patient, who had tried to die on us so much that week. For all of us that week, the paper patient came first!
The
world of simulation is a daunting one. As physicians, we tend to feel very much
on display -our flaws, our gaps in knowledge, and our panic, are all exposed
for all to see and judge. However, this exposure is exactly what
"sim" is meant to achieve. It focuses an objective lens on our
performance, so that when real-life imitates sim, we can deploy the maximum of
our honed skills and knowledge in service for our patient. For all physicians,
it is the patient who comes first.

In mentoring our superb Vietnamese
colleagues, their dedication to their patients was made very obvious! Though we
were limited by a very low fidelity model - literally a patient drawn on paper
towels, with a plastic airway "head" - our Vietnamese friends
eventually approached our model as the real thing. Initially of course, they,
like most physicians, were a little apprehensive, and took some time to adjust
to the unique learning environment that is sim. However, after a few days, it
was readily apparent that they had quickly absorbed the basic principles that sim
tries to teach - communication, effective team interactions, how to regulate
one's own panic. They were now enthusiastic participants. I was impressed at
how well read the physicians were and, indeed, also how well read the senior
ICU nurses were. Though they did not have access to the same resources as we
do, in their practice environment they clearly had an idea of what their
patients' care should aspire to.
Moreover, our Vietnamese colleagues care.
They, like us, worry about their patients, they agonize over mistakes (even
simulated ones), and they want to do better. Perhaps it was this quality that
bonded the CHKV Team to our Vietnamese colleagues: the common goal of
exercising the full extent of our knowledge and abilities, all in service to
our patient. One incident warmly solidified this bond for me.
During one simulation code, Dr. Veroukis and I threw a little wrinkle into our simulation case, and showed our Vietnamese team leader a hand-drawn rhythm strip tracing. It was ventricular fibrillation. In addition to the team leader, the whole team saw it. Within a fraction of second, the whole team sprung into action! The airway physicians immediately started positioning the airway, and began setting up for an intubation. The medication team member reached for the drug syringes. The physician leader, eyes wide with concern, and a bit of healthy fear, immediately pointed to one of her team members to start CPR. Without a moment's hesitation, that team member interlocked their fingers and placed them on our paper model's chest, and began the first compression...and then sheepishly smiled. Educators, and mock code team members alike shared a warm little chuckle, but applauded our colleague for how much they "bought in" to the virtual patient. Our dear, oh so vulnerable, paper patient, who had tried to die on us so much that week. For all of us that week, the paper patient came first!
Obstetrics
By: Stephanie Johnston
I have to say that this mission has been very different from my two prior missions to Africa. One: the team has been amazing, creating a very supportive environment for troubleshooting and problem solving. Two: being part of an education-based mission has been quite eye opening.
My second presentation
and my simulation scenario addressed postpartum hemorrhage and
preeclampsia. These topics highlighted
another area of confusion, namely their local practice consists of giving oxytocin 10 IU IM and misoprostol 600 to 1000mcg SL
as a prophylactic treatment to actively manage the third stage. It appears from the stories I am told that
about 5 years ago a patient received a 5 IU bolus of oxytocin IV which resulted in
profound hypotension, prompting a change in practice within the hospital. I am quite surprised by this change in
practice and was shocked that they are looking towards me to provide an answer
and almost endorse that a 5 IU IV bolus is OK, or that if they mix the 5 IU in 5mL
of NS and give it slowly, that is... an adequate dose.
These brief conversations that are parsed together with broken, simple
English have started to show me that there can be a distinct difference between
academic/book knowledge and practical or actual practice. Unfortunately, I have had very little
opportunity to see or experience their clinical practice.
When I was asked to participate with this
mission in August 2015, I was speechless and the invitation came at a very
karmic time. I was in Chicago completing
the first of many courses for my Masters of Health Professionals Education
(MHPE). Chau’s kind email arrived asking
if I would be willing to participate. I
was ecstatic as I have wanted to participate in another medical mission, but
due to prior experience I only wanted to participate if the mission was
education-based. Once I had a chance
upon my return to discuss the opportunity with my colleagues at the office, I
was fully on board for the mission.
I have to say that this mission has been very different from my two prior missions to Africa. One: the team has been amazing, creating a very supportive environment for troubleshooting and problem solving. Two: being part of an education-based mission has been quite eye opening.
My role for this mission was to provide two
obstetrically-related lectures and an associated skills station. From an education perspective, it was quite
challenging to decide on the topics and depth of coverage I should provide
within the lectures. I did make an
attempt to have influence from the OBGYN department in Long Xuyen; however, I
feel there may have been a loss of information in translation. The initial request was for a fertility talk
and I think this may be due to my name being found on the website for the
fertility clinic at home. Considering
that fertility is probably not the primary concern in An Giang province, I
decided to focus my efforts on the top 2 killers for maternal health: postpartum hemorrhage and preeclampsia. In addition, I decided to add some
information about preterm labour. Little
did I know, that the information I gave about preterm labour would be the point
of interest.
Our
first day of the education conference was full of chaos and interest as we tried
to sort out the best method for establishing flow within the groups. I was very fortunate to have a translator, Dr.
Tho, a practicing Vietnamese OBGYN, helping to facilitate my station. During my planning/development phase, I was
informed that labetalol, hydralazine, nifedipine and methyldopa were available
in An Giang and I was quite excited to have developed a “pretend uterus” by
using hot pink gardening knee pads. When
I started my simulation scenario at the hospital, which was based on
preeclampsia, I was quite impressed with their answers to the multiple steps I
provided during the history and physical exam.
They were quite informed and knowledgeable at recognizing gestational
hypertension, preeclampsia and HELLP Syndrome.
Once we started to try and treat the hypertension, I encountered some
new challenges, as the concept of simulation is quite foreign to them. There was some confusion over drug choices,
as I provided a bag with multiple “home-labelled syringes” to choose from. They were familiar with labetalol and
hydralazine; however, there seemed to be some confusion around which drug to
choose. We continued to muddle through
the scenario, as they recognized that she needed to be delivered. Delivery of the infant, via the birthing
prompt pelvis, was received with reasonable receptivity. When I started to make her bleed, using a
long, dark red scarf, the group of obstetricians reacted very quickly,
following a similar method/protocol to Canada.
I almost felt like I was in the middle of an OSCE at home. Their choice of drug dosings are different,
but the same approach is taken. In some
ways, I feel as though I was almost useless or causing more harm than good with
my teachings, as I am not familiar with their local practices and available
treatment options.
It has been a very interesting perspective
doing this mission with my new education background. I am finding this mission to be rewarding in
some perspectives and challenging or disappointing in other ways. I have had some very cool “Eureka” moments
during the past week as I am using the birthing prompt when I don’t have a
translator. It is reassuring to say that
the process of childbirth is very much the same in Vietnam. Using good ol’ fashion charades and hand
gestures, a great deal can be taught.
Learning to think on the fly, I ended up spending an afternoon
practicing shoulder dystocia and breech deliveries with some keen district
“rural” doctors. As an educator it was
really cool to have students apply the “See one, Do one, Teach one”
philosophy. As we worked through
different techniques for shoulders including Woods corkscrew, delivery of the
posterior arm and J-maneuver, the students were keen to have me show them and
for them to try. We were able to rename
them with hand signals using “1, 2 or 3 fingers”. My favourite moments would be when a new
member would join the group and their colleagues would start the
scenario/delivery for the new member and teach them how to do the different
techniques or how they would correct each others’ techniques. It is one of those moments that inspires me
to continue pursuing my education training.
From another perspective, I feel as though
I was significantly underprepared for my presentations. The obstetrical staff
are very well read about the literature and seemed aware of current
practices. I started my first lecture
talking about preterm labour trying to cover antenatal corticosteroids, magnesium
sulfate and indomethacin. I was privileged
at seeing their knowledge base during a thorough pimping question period as my practice method significantly differed from
their approach. The biggest challenge
came when I did not address the drugs they use for tocolysis as they asked
questions about several drugs I had never even heard of before. By the end of the presentation, I felt like
I had just finished a high risk rounds presentation at home and not performed
to my full ability. It has been a
lesson to me to be better prepared in the future and to complete some
background research about the health care system. After the presentation, one of the OBs, Dr.
Hieng, approached me to discuss some of my clinical recommendations. The conversation revealed that they do not
have access to IV hydralazine or labetalol to manage hypertension in
preeclampsia. Additionally, I seemed to
have caused quite a stir by not using nifedipine or betamimetics for
tocolysis. It has highlighted another
aspect for me to ensure one is aware of the current, local clinical
climate. Feeling guilty for my poor
performance and ensuing confusion that I caused, I offered to create a third
presentation to address the shortcomings of my earlier presentation.
Gyne Skills Station
By: Joanna Webb
I am a family physician with an interest in
women’s health so it seemed a natural fit to run a gynecologic skills station
at the CHKV symposium. My main teaching
tool was a “pelvic trainer” which consists of a silicone model vagina, cervix
and uterus. Lucky we didn’t get too many
questions or comments as we passed through customs!
My skills station primarily focused on the
insertion of IUD contraceptive devices.
With limited access to translators teaching was done primarily through
watching and hands on training. Although initially shy at times it was amazing watching the rotating groups warm
up, and by the end of the session, participants were eagerly inserting sample
IUDs and teaching each other various tips and tricks.
Although not yet widely available, I am
hopeful IUDs will become more prevalent in Vietnam. With any luck, the gynecologists will remember
the pelvic trainer and feel more confident with their IUD insertions.
By: Lisa Bryski (partnered with Sarah Painter)
The teaching goes both ways, though. We’ve been humbled by the hospital staff’s willingness to include us in their rounds about patients they are managing. Despite our obvious language barriers as Canadians, we have been treated with great respect when we try to understand or join in a medical discussion. It has taught us the true meaning of collegial professionalism and hosting.
The hospital staff have a wide range of cases. Their beds are full and their workload busy. Their resources must be doled out carefully to where the need is greatest and the greatest good can be achieved. It is a difficult job they do, much more difficult than what we are used to in Canada. They do it with great grace, however. Each family we have come across in our patient discussions is treated with respect and dignity despite the limited space and resources.
It’s Week 2 of the CHKV Medical Mission to Vietnam. It’s been an intense but fun trip. The CHKV crew returns well rested from a weekend off and are ready for more teaching and learning. The staff here is a dedicated crew, and have thrown themselves wholeheartedly into any teaching moments we’ve provided.
The teaching goes both ways, though. We’ve been humbled by the hospital staff’s willingness to include us in their rounds about patients they are managing. Despite our obvious language barriers as Canadians, we have been treated with great respect when we try to understand or join in a medical discussion. It has taught us the true meaning of collegial professionalism and hosting.The hospital staff have a wide range of cases. Their beds are full and their workload busy. Their resources must be doled out carefully to where the need is greatest and the greatest good can be achieved. It is a difficult job they do, much more difficult than what we are used to in Canada. They do it with great grace, however. Each family we have come across in our patient discussions is treated with respect and dignity despite the limited space and resources.
In our conference teaching sessions, it’s been a great privilege to watch the participants grow in both knowledge and in confidence. The first day was full of timid interactions by teachers and students alike. We’ve encouraged each other and have found how much fun it is to be together while we learn. It’s a true joy to see the students now run through resuscitation tasks and codes with confidence. They are also teaching each other as they continue to practice. It’s a great sign that the knowledge has taken, and they will continue to grow once we are gone.
We have only a couple days left to continue to share learning with the conference participants. We’ve come to know them as individuals with great senses of humour and a strong thirst for knowledge. It will be tough to say goodbye on the final day. We hope to return some day for another conference. We’ve made so many connections and friends within this hospital.
By: Sarah Painter
Perhaps one of the most valuable and rewarding exercises was our demonstrations. In contemporary medical practice, we have recently experienced a shift in focus. When providing care for an acute patient requiring resuscitation, having an organized team approach with a team leader and assignments for key roles with two way communication is most effective. This more modern approach, often referred to as 'resusctiationist theory' is a critical to deliver safe and effective patient care.
In medicine, this is learned and extremely different from the traditional approach. In Canada, we have the benefit of robust resources and access to education allowing for the uptake of this type of practice. During a demonstration of CPR, we had inquired as to the normal approach from the hospital and were informed that they follow these standards and use a team approach. Lisa and I were assigned to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support station - which takes CPR/defibrillation and introduces advanced functions such as airway management and medications.
What we quickly discovered in the skill station, was that there was an opportunity to improve this area. We often enter these situations with a preconceived notion of what we can anticipate. I had expected a team approach that we have become accustomed in tertiary centres at home. But even introducing this structure at our own hospitals at home has been difficult. It takes time and focus to implement this practice. Teams do not practice this way by accident. You have to learn. So once we realized that this would be a great area of focus, we found a way to incorporate it into our symposium.
Everyday after lunch, we would gather the participants (including those video-conferenced in) at the front of the room and focus on a new area. First, the CHKV team members did a demonstration of an ACLS code. The next day, we focused on a trauma patient. The next day, we did a pediatric case. All of the cases included a team leader and team members modelling good communication strategies and an organized systematic approach.
Once participants were more aware and comfortable, we encouraged them to participate in supported way and provided feedback as the cases progressed. By the end of the week, we could see the participants developing new skills that they could incorporate in their practice. As with every new approach, it takes time for practice to evolve in the complex world of in-hospital care. However, we were able to give them essential building blocks and introduce the concept of effective team strategies.


























No comments:
Post a Comment